Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF B. v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
CORRIGENDUM TO:# Council Regulation (EEC) No 1934/82 of 12 July 1982 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2603/69 establishing common rules for exports
CASE OF TUREK v. SLOVAKIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARUSTE
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 12 July 2012. Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 775/2009 of 26 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF ANTONOV AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 February 1996. Criminal proceedings against Didier Vergy.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 851/78 of 24 April 1978 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2114/71 on the subsidy for oil seeds
GUSTAFSSON v. SWEDENPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MM. TRECHSEL AND BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1565/91 of 10 June 1991 amending for the eleventh time Regulation (EEC) No 3800/81 determining the classification of vine varieties

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2021.

Banco Santander, SA v European Commission.

C-52/19 P • 62019CJ0052 • ECLI:EU:C:2021:794

Inbound citations: 11
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 82

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

fj unique documents citing • XG citations total to s paragraphs

Outbound citations

mW unique documents cited • 48 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846