Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES HOLMBÄCK, ROSS AND WOLD
CASE OF JOSAN v. MOLDOVAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAVLOVSCHI
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2010. Christos Gogos v European Commission.
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 October 2007. Avena Nordic Grain Oy.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 666/2003 of 11 April 2003 provisionally authorising the use of certain micro-organisms in feedingstuffs (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF MARIAN AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 161/88 of 21 January 1988 on offers tendered in respect of the 13th invitation to tender issued under the standing invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EEC) No 3905/86
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 145/77 of 25 January 1977 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF PALADI v. MOLDOVAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE Å IKUTA
Regulation (EEC) No 1295/74 of the Commission of 22 May 1974 on the processing of beef bought-in by intervention agencies

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.

Ondřej Múka v European Commission.

T-214/21 • 62021TJ0214 • ECLI:EU:T:2022:607

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

e unique documents citing • 1 citations total to o paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846