Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MKHITARYAN v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA-SANDSTRÖM
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 189/87 of 22 January 1987 introducing a countervailing charge on apples originating in Poland
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013. European Commission v Czech Republic.
AFFAIRE GARRIDO HERRERO c. ESPAGNEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RAVARANI
CASE OF Y.Y. v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS, JOINED BY JUDGE KŪRIS
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1583/86 of 23 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3103/76 on aid for durum wheat
CASE OF AUGUSTO v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021. VK v An Bord Pleanála.
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.

Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission.

C-693/20 P • 62020CJ0693 • ECLI:EU:C:2023:172

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 252

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Q unique documents citing • s citations total to C paragraphs

Outbound citations

lT unique documents cited • NFN citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846