Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 March 2012. European Commission v Republic of Poland.
CASE OF LEW v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HIRVELÄ
ONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES DOOEL SKOPJE v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1176/2003 of 1 July 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 1019/2002 on marketing standards for olive oil
CASE OF O'DONOGHUE AND OTHERS AND 2 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FEYZİ YILDIRIM v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TÃœRMEN
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3297/92 of 13 November 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 establishing an agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2000/93 of 23 July 1993 fixing the storage aid for unprocessed dried grapes and dried figs from the 1992/93 marketing year
CASE OF LESTINI v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON, RUSSO AND VALTICOS
CASE OF ERDOĞAN YAĞIZ v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CABRAL BARRETO

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 February 2023.

European Commission v Italian Republic.

C-623/20 P • 62020CJ0623 • ECLI:EU:C:2023:97

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 19

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

f unique documents citing • 3 citations total to D paragraphs

Outbound citations

t unique documents cited • ch citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846