Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 665/2002 of 18 April 2002 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLANDPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE NUSSBERGER
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 of 8 February 2017 setting out the technical and operational specifications allowing the commercial service offered by the system established under the Galileo programme to fulfil the function referred to in Article 2(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 522/85 of 28 February 1985 fixing the export refunds on oil seeds
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JOÄŒIENÄ–
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 408/92 of 19 February 1992 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2014. Intelcom Service Ltd v Vincenzo Mario Marvulli.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2000/77 of 7 September 1977 fixing the refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
CASE OF NAFORNIȚA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2004. Land Brandenburg v Ursula Sass.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2018. Bruno Dell'Acqua v Eurocom Srl and Regione Lombardia.

C-370/16 • 62016CJ0370 • ECLI:EU:C:2018:344

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 55

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

p unique documents citing • I citations total to n paragraphs

Outbound citations

F unique documents cited • kG citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846