Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ZNAMENSKAYA v. RUSSIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ROZAKIS, BOTOUCHAROVA AND HAJIYEV
CASE OF RELIGIONSGEMEINSCHAFT DER ZEUGEN JEHOVAS AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE STEINER
CASE OF TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA (NO. 2)CONCURRIN G OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER JOINED BY JUDGE MALINVERNI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 284/94 of 8 February 1994 authorizing the conclusion of long-term private storage contracts for table wine, grape must, concentrated grape must and rectified concentrated grape must for the 1993/94 wine year
CASE OF BENITEZ MORIANA AND IÑIGO FERNANDEZ v. SPAINJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ELÓSEGUI AND SERGHIDES
CASE OF TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JAMBREK
CASE OF OAO NEFTYANAYA KOMPANIYA YUKOS v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JEBENS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 54/2000 of 10 January 2000 determining the world market price for unginned cotton and the rate for the aid
Commission Regulation (EC) No 13/2006 of 5 January 2006 fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1809/2005
CASE OF McMICHAEL v. THE UNITED KINGDOMJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES RYSSDAL, PALM AND Sir John FREELAND

Document text Analytics

Decision of the Court of Justice (Reviewing Chamber) of 17 September 2018.

HG v European Commission.

C-543/18 RX • 62018CD0543 • ECLI:EU:C:2018:764

Inbound citations: 114
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 8

Keywords

Review

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

yO unique documents citing • ZN3 citations total to A paragraphs

Outbound citations

k unique documents cited • Z citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 407441 • Paragraphs parsed: 46322205 • Citations processed 3518997