Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF CHANKAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF REMLI v. FRANCEDISSE NTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
CASE OF GUT v. POLAND
CASE OF SOYTEMİZ v. TURKEY
CASE OF AGDAS v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 of 12 March 2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements (Text with EEA relevance)
CASE OF T.A. v. SWEDEN
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 283/83 of 2 February 1983 fixing the maximum export refund for raw sugar for the 21st partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the principal standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 2013/82
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ZIEMELE, JOINED BY JUDGE Å IKUTA
CASE OF DĀVIDSONS AND SAVINS AGAINST LATVIA

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 December 2011. Rastelli Davide e C. Snc v Jean-Charles Hidoux.

C-191/10 • 62010CJ0191 • ECLI:EU:C:2011:838

Inbound citations: 14
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 15

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

I unique documents citing • vP citations total to Q paragraphs

Outbound citations

J unique documents cited • ix citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846