Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MANTOVANELLI v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
Commission Regulation (EC) No 291/96 of 15 February 1996 fixing an export tax in relation to the product falling within CN code 1003 00 90
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2012. Comap SA v European Commission.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 71/90 of 11 January 1990 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
Commission Regulation (EC) No 170/94 of 28 January 1994 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1464/87 of 26 May 1987 classifying goods in subheading 21.07 G I c) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff
Commission Regulation (EC) No 258/2000 of 2 February 2000 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber), 30 May 2013. Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X BV.
CASE OF ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MERT
CASE OF FATMA NUR ERTEN AND ADNAN ERTEN AGAINST TURKEY

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 November 2020.

Criminal proceedings against AZ.

C-510/19 • 62019CJ0510 • ECLI:EU:C:2020:953

Inbound citations: 108
•
Cited paragraphs: 15
•
Outbound citations: 64

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

BU unique documents citing • rrt citations total to sw paragraphs

Outbound citations

Tx unique documents cited • Af citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846