Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021. K and Others v Tesco Stores Ltd.
CASE OF KOVAL AND OTHERS v. UKRAINEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
CASE OF STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH AND KRAWAGNA-PFEIFER v. AUSTRIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE JEBENS
CASE OF DZELILI v. GERMANYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER
CASE OF LOIZOU AND OTHERS v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž
CASE OF I AVGI PUBLISHING AND PRESS AGENCY S.A. & KARIS AGAINST GREECE AND 3 OTHER CASES
CASE OF AMIHALACHIOAIE v. MOLDOVAPARTLY CONCURRING , PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THOMASSEN
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 June 2010. CopyGene A/S v Skatteministeriet.
MAZZEI SALVATORE S.R.L. AND SALVAGUARDIA AMBIENTALE S.P.A. v. ITALY
M.A. FAYED, A. FAYED AND S. FAYED v. the UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MR. B. MARXER

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 October 2019. IN and JM v Belgische Staat.

C-469/18 • 62018CJ0469 • ECLI:EU:C:2019:895

Inbound citations: 21
•
Cited paragraphs: 7
•
Outbound citations: 32

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Wp unique documents citing • Fp citations total to O paragraphs

Outbound citations

lj unique documents cited • IZ citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846