Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1482/96 of 26 July 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1068/93 on detailed rules for determining and applying in the agricultural conversion rates
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES HOLMBÄCK, ROSS AND WOLD
CASE OF SYNDICAT NATIONAL DES PROFESSIONNELS DES PROCEDURES COLLECTIVES v. FRANCE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2044/2005 of 14 December 2005 fixing the A1 and B export refunds for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, lemons and apples)
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020. European Commission v Hungary.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 June 2016. Pippo Pizzo v CRGT Srl.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 1999. Modelo SGPS SA v Director-Geral dos Registos e Notariado.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 666/2003 of 11 April 2003 provisionally authorising the use of certain micro-organisms in feedingstuffs (Text with EEA relevance)
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 564/79 of 26 March 1979 fixing the reference price for tomatoes for the month of April 1979
VIN SAT DOO VINICA AND OTHERS v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" and 1 other application

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 15 December 1999.

Kesko Oy v Commission of the European Communities.

T-22/97 • 61997TJ0022 • ECLI:EU:T:1999:327

Inbound citations: 21
•
Cited paragraphs: 16
•
Outbound citations: 94

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

20 unique documents citing • pq citations total to U5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

lD unique documents cited • Zf citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846