Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PALADI v. MOLDOVAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR NICOLAS BRATZA
Judgment of the Court of 8 March 2001. Friedrich Jauch v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter.
CASE OF R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMINDIVIDUAL SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
VILVARAJAH ; SKANDARAJAH ; SIVAKUMARAN ; NAVRATNASINGAM ; RASALINGAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 66/95 of 17 January 1995 fixing the export refunds on pigmeat
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1198/82 of 18 May 1982 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1357/80 introducing a system of premiums for maintaining suckler cows
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009 Text with EEA relevance
CASE OF ASPROFTAS v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
FAZLIĆ AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1988/89 of 4 July 1989 concerning applications for export licences for products falling within CN code 1101 00 00 with advance fixing of the refund

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 January 2021. Lexel AB v Skatteverket.

C-484/19 • 62019CJ0484 • ECLI:EU:C:2021:34

Inbound citations: 14
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 66

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Y unique documents citing • EO citations total to t paragraphs

Outbound citations

MA unique documents cited • uo citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846