Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF PETUKHOV v. UKRAINE (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
CASE OF SANCHO CRUZ AND OTHER “AGRARIAN REFORM” CASES v. PORTUGAL
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3059/78 of 21 December 1978 on common rules for imports of certain textile products originating in third countries
Commission Regulation (EC) No 37/2003 of 9 January 2003 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 85/92 of 15 January 1992 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 304/88 of 1 February 1988 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
Commission Regulation (EC) No 5/2005 of 4 January 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
ÖZKAN, YALCIN, CAYTAS, AKGEYIK, YALCIN, MURATAKAN, ABDÜLKAYA, MURATAKAN AND ABDÜLKAYA v. TURKEY
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1470/80 of 9 June 1980 on the safeguard measures provided for in the second ACP-EEC Convention
CASE OF ZLIČIĆ v. SERBIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BO Å NJAK

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 April 2004. Finanzamt Gummersbach v Gerhard Bockemühl.

C-90/02 • 62002CJ0090 • ECLI:EU:C:2004:206

Inbound citations: 34
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 3

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

2p unique documents citing • yC citations total to Y paragraphs

Outbound citations

K unique documents cited • H citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846