Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ŞIK v. TURKEY (No. 2)PARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE YÃœKSEL
CASE OF SAADI v. ITALYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER, JOINED BY JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY
CASE OF A.P. v. SLOVAKIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KELLER AND SERGHIDES
CASE OF LEBEDEV v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S KOVLER AND JEBENS
CASE OF FINANCIAL TIMES LTD AND OTHERS AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AMIHALACHIOAIE v. MOLDOVAPARTLY CONCURRING , PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THOMASSEN
CASE OF KRIVOVA v. UKRAINEPARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE YUDKIVSKA
CASE OF L.B. v. HUNGARYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WOJTYCZEK AND PACZOLAY
CASE OF PAPACHELAS v. GREECEPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TULKENS
CASE OF NASRI v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WILDHABER

Document text Analytics

Commission Regulation (EC) No 77/2009 of 26 January 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe

77/2009 • 32009R0077

Legal Acts - Regulations

Inbound citations: 26
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 6

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Ye unique documents citing • sD citations total to u paragraphs

Outbound citations

p unique documents cited • C citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846