Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TOMASI v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DE MEYER
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section
CASE OF EZEH AND CONNORS AND 3 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BALATON AIRPORT KFT AGAINST HUNGARY AND 22 OTHER CASES
CASE OF DEMİR AND BAYKARA v. TURKEYSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ZAGREBELSKY
Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material
PROMIMPRO EXPORTS AND IMPORTS LIMITED AND SINEQUANON INVEST v. UKRAINE
Council Regulation (EC) No 1146/2001 of 11 June 2001 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Liberia
Regulation (EEC) No 1216/68 of the Commission of 9 August 1968 laying down the method for determining the lactose content of compound feeding-stuffs imported from third countries
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2807/88 of 9 September 1988 amending Regulation (EEC) No 771/74 laying down detailed rules for granting aid for flax and hemp

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 January 2022.

Romania v European Commission.

C-899/19 P • 62019CJ0899 • ECLI:EU:C:2022:41

Inbound citations: 9
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 64

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

7 unique documents citing • qB citations total to t paragraphs

Outbound citations

I unique documents cited • DL citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846