Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2022. FK v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 29/2012 of 13 January 2012 on marketing standards for olive oil
CASE OF ODDONE AND PECCI v. SAN MARINOCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WOJTYCZEK
C.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR M.P. PELLONPÄÄ, JOINED BY
CASE OF ÖNERYILDIZ v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MULARONI
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025. A v B.
THE FORMER KING OF GREECE, PRINCESS IRENE AND PRINCESS EKATERINI v. GREECE
CASE OF MOLDOVAHIDROMAS v. MOLDOVADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAVLOVSCHI
CASE OF KLASS AND OTHERS v. GERMANYSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PINHEIRO FARINHA
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 October 2009. Arthur Gottwald v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Bregenz.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 5 September 2012. Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Y and Z.

C-71/11 • 62011CJ0071 • ECLI:EU:C:2012:518

Inbound citations: 52
•
Cited paragraphs: 19
•
Outbound citations: 13

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Qe unique documents citing • 1V citations total to 0H paragraphs

Outbound citations

V unique documents cited • qt citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846