Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF H. v. BELGIUMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINHEIRO FARINHA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 77/92 of 14 January 1992 altering the import levies on products processed from cereals and rice
CASE OF LIPCAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
CASE OFÖZGÜR RADYO-SES RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYIN YAPIM VE TANITIM A.Ş. v. TURKEY (No. 2)
Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 December 2005. Request for a preliminary ruling from Landgericht Koblenz.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 152/82 of 22 January 1982 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 March 2023. Sympatex Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
CASE OF KRZYŻEK v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HIRVELÄ
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2903/78 of 5 December 1978 amending Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 100/76 as regards squid

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 January 2023. RW v Österreichische Post AG.

C-154/21 • 62021CJ0154 • ECLI:EU:C:2023:3

Inbound citations: 9
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 37

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

i unique documents citing • RN citations total to z paragraphs

Outbound citations

Da unique documents cited • rM citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846