Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF JUHNKE v. TURKEYP ARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 689/78 of 6 April 1978 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1307/77 as regards the time limit fixed for the lodging of applications for premiums
CASE OF KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PEJCHAL
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2017. Minister for Justice and Equality v Tomas Vilkas.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1943/2006 of 12 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 setting up the Galileo Joint Undertaking
CASE OF BOULTIF v. SWITZERLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES BAKA, WILDHABER AND LORENZEN
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2137/93 of 28 July 1993 fixing the export refunds in the wine sector and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 646/86
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 4/95 of 3 January 1995 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011. Arkema SA v European Commission.
CASE OF R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE GERSING

Document text Analytics

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 275/96 of 13 February 1996 amending representative prices and additional duties for the import of certain products in the sugar sector

275/96 • 31996R0275

Legal Acts - Regulations

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

J unique documents citing • m citations total to 4 paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846