Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIAJOINT CONCURRIN G OPINION OF JUDGES NICOLAOU AND KELLER
CASE OF SACILOR-LORMINES AGAINST FRANCE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3453/88 of 4 November 1988 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3052/88 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of paint, distemper, varnish and similar brushes originating in the people's Republic of China
Commission Regulation (EC) No 507/2000 of 8 March 2000 fixing the export refunds on olive oil
CASE OF OLUJIC AGAINST CROATIA
CASE OF MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE K Ū RIS
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 85/95 of 19 January 1995 on import licences for milk and milk products originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) or in the overseas countries and territories (OCT)
RAPPAPORT v. FRANCE
CASE OF HERMI v. ITALYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ROZAKIS, SPIELMANN, MYJER AND ZIEMELE
CASE OF MARGARETIĆ AGAINST CROATIA

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 July 2004. Pearle BV, Hans Prijs Optiek Franchise BV and Rinck Opticiëns BV v Hoofdbedrijfschap Ambachten.

C-345/02 • 62002CJ0345 • ECLI:EU:C:2004:448

Inbound citations: 76
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

eC unique documents citing • NL citations total to g paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846