Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF HOLM v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES RYSSDAL AND WILDHABER
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 June 2022. Equinoccio-Compañía de Comercio Exterior, SL v European Commission.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3655/90 of 11 December 1990 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1009/86 establishing general rules applying to production refunds in the cereals and rice sector
Commission Regulation (EC) No 116/2006 of 24 January 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2108/84 of 23 July 1984 laying down detailed rules for determining the mesh size of fishing nets
Règlement (CEE) n 2/68 de la Commission, du 2 janvier 1968, portant fixation des primes s'ajoutant aux prélèvements pour les céréales et le malt
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1592/2001 of 2 August 2001 correcting Regulations (EC) No 562/2000 and (EC) No 690/2001 in the beef sector
CASE OF AL-ADSANI v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE PELLONPÄÄ JOINED BY JUDGE Sir Nicolas BRATZA
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 July 1992. Reinhard Maier v Freistaat Bayern.
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2011. European Commission v Portuguese Republic.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020.

Hamas v Council of the European Union.

C-386/19 P • 62019CJ0386 • ECLI:EU:C:2020:691

Inbound citations: 11
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 23

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Kd unique documents citing • Pk citations total to A paragraphs

Outbound citations

v6 unique documents cited • 0g citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846