Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
CASE OF SH.D. AND OTHERS v. GREECE, AUSTRIA, CROATIA, HUNGARY, NORTH MACEDONIA, SERBIA AND SLOVENIA
CASE OF KIRAKOSYAN v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA-SANDSTRÖM
Independent News and Media and Independent Newspapers Ireland Limited v. Ireland (dec.)
CASE OF SILGIR v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
CLINTON, SIMPSON, MAGUIRE, McGEOWN, MURRAY, CAMPBELL, SMYTH, BRESLIN, CONNOLLY, McGUINNESS, L., M., N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTTO-PREMINGER-INSTITUT v. AUSTRIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES PALM, PEKKANEN AND MAKARCZYK
Van MECHELEN, VENERIUS, VENERIUS and PRUIJMBOOM v. THE NETHERLANDSDISSENTING OPINION OF MRS. J. LIDDY, JOINED BY
RÎBAC AND RODINA-AGRO S.A. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF STÖGMÜLLER v. AUSTRIASEPARATE JOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES VERDROSS AND BILGE

Document text Analytics

Commission Regulation (EEC) No 86/91 of 14 January 1991 on the supply of various consignments of cereals as food aid

86/91 • 31991R0086

Legal Acts - Regulations

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 22

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

P unique documents citing • c citations total to O paragraphs

Outbound citations

e unique documents cited • 5j citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846