Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LTD AND J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LAND LTD v. THE UNITED KINGDOMJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES MARUSTE, GARLICKI AND BORREGO BORREGO
SUTHERLAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF MM. K. HERNDL AND I. BÉKÉS
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3879/86 of 18 December 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2315/86, amending Annex VI of Regulation (EEC) No 3796/81 on the common organization of the market in fishery products
CASE OF HAASE AGAINST GERMANY
CASE OF AL HUSIN AGAINST BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 102/78 of 18 January 1978 laying down special conditions for exports of certain cheeses to Austria
CASE OF SABEH EL LEIL AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN SHIPPING LINES AGAINST TURKEY
CASE OF GURGENIDZE AGAINST GEORGIA
Judgment of the Court of 4 February 1959. Friedrich Stork & Cie v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 18 June 1996.

European Parliament v Council of the European Union.

C-303/94 • 61994CJ0303 • ECLI:EU:C:1996:238

Inbound citations: 23
•
Cited paragraphs: 10
•
Outbound citations: 14

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Sx unique documents citing • XL citations total to VX paragraphs

Outbound citations

k unique documents cited • 0k citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846