Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF M. AND C. v. ROMANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MYJER
Council Regulation (EEC) No 175/83 of 25 January 1983 allocating certain catch quotas between Member States for vessels fishing in the Norwegian economic zone and the fishery zone around Jan Mayen
CASE OF MARIO FEDERICI v. ITALY (No. 2)
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 73/85 of 10 January 1985 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
CASE OF DUDCHENKO v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 359/92 of 14 February 1992 fixing the import levies on rice and broken rice
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
CASE OF TAGGATIDIS AND OTHERS AGAINST GREECE AND 32 OTHER CASES
CASE OF AKDENIZ v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GÖLCÜKLÜ
CASE OF MESSINA v. ITALY (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BONELLO

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 October 2021.

ClientEarth v European Commission.

C-458/19 P • 62019CJ0458 • ECLI:EU:C:2021:802

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 25

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

P unique documents citing • N citations total to a paragraphs

Outbound citations

t3 unique documents cited • 6W citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846