Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF CATALDO AND OTHERS v. ITALYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES SAJÓ AND KŪRIS
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 365/2014 of 7 April 2014 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff
Commission Regulation (EC) No 191/2005 of 3 February 2005 fixing the export refunds on syrups and certain other sugar products exported in the natural state
CASE OF BIRAGHI AND OTHERS v. ITALYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S SAJ Ó AND K Ū RIS
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 422/82 of 24 February 1982 fixing the amount of the subsidy on oil seeds
CASE OF BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAINJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES LAGERGREN, PETTITI AND MACDONALD
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 6/97 of 6 January 1997 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EC) No 197/2004 of 4 February 2004 concerning applications for export licences for rice and broken rice with advance fixing of the refund
CASE OF KEMMACHE v. FRANCE (No. 3)DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WALSH

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 November 2021. Criminal proceedings against AB and Others.

C-3/20 • 62020CJ0003 • ECLI:EU:C:2021:969

Inbound citations: 10
•
Cited paragraphs: 8
•
Outbound citations: 30

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

3 unique documents citing • 8A citations total to 5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

W5 unique documents cited • yj citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846