Browsing history:

↳
PAUGER v. AUSTRIAOPINION OF MR. TRECHSEL, JOINED BY MR. A.S. GÖZÜBÜYÜK
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3582/83 of 19 December 1983 amending for the third time Regulation (EEC) No 3800/81 determining the classification of vine varieties
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3131/81 of 28 October 1981 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 19.08 B of the Common Customs Tariff
CASE OF FERREIRA ALVES v. PORTUGAL (No. 6)
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 June 2020. Criminal proceedings against JI.
CASE OF STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH AGAINST AUSTRIA (No. 3) AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF PİŞKİN v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE BO Å NJAK
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4/93 of 4 January 1993 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
THE ESTATE OF JOHANNA GEYER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 June 2010. Belgian State v Nathalie De Fruytier.

C-237/09 • 62009CJ0237 • ECLI:EU:C:2010:316

Inbound citations: 20
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 16

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

x0 unique documents citing • rP citations total to D paragraphs

Outbound citations

CT unique documents cited • ih citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846