Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 94/2004 of 20 January 2004 determining the world market price for unginned cotton
CASES OF KARHUVAARA AND ILTALEHTI AND SELISTO AGAINST FINLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 281/98 of 3 February 1998 setting the intervention threshold for tomatoes for the 1998 marketing year
CASE OF PHILIS v. GREECEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI
CASE OF KOSAITĖ - ČYPIENĖ AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LAFFRANQUE
Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber), 5 December 2013. Walter Vapenik v Josef Thurner.
Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 March 2011. Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 102/92 of 16 January 1992 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIASEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 125/98 of 16 January 1998 fixing the export refunds on beef and veal

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.

Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.

C-346/18 P • 62018CJ0346 • ECLI:EU:C:2019:939

Inbound citations: 13
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 14

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

J3 unique documents citing • E3 citations total to p paragraphs

Outbound citations

AP unique documents cited • Sj citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846