Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF HENRYK URBAN AND RYSZARD URBAN AGAINST POLAND
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3819/92 of 28 December 1992 on detailed rules for determining and applying the agricultural conversion rates
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 1996. Hans Walter Mrozek and Bernhard Jäger.
CASE OF OROŽIM v. SLOVENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PEJCHAL
CASE OF LINGENS v. AUSTRIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2661/80 of 17 October 1980 laying down detailed rules for applying the variable slaughter premium for sheep
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 December 2005. Centralan Property Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2001 of 11 January 2001 fixing the export refunds on olive oil
Commission Regulation (EC) No 183/2002 of 31 January 2002 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
CASE OF RAMKOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 May 2019.

European Commission v Hungary.

C-235/17 • 62017CJ0235 • ECLI:EU:C:2019:432

Inbound citations: 124
•
Cited paragraphs: 29
•
Outbound citations: 78

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

y3 unique documents citing • mkv citations total to Zu paragraphs

Outbound citations

cL unique documents cited • dG citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846