Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF VASTBERGA TAXI AKTIEBOLAG AND VULIC v. SWEDEN
Commission Regulation (EC) No 84/2002 of 17 January 2002 on the issuing of export licences for products processed from fruit and vegetables
CASE OF B. v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE WALSH
CASE OF J.K. AND OTHERS v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RANZONI
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1293/79 of 25 June 1979 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1111/77 laying down common provisions for isoglucose
CASE OF PROTOPAPA v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 117/86 of 22 January 1986 fixing the import levies on rice and broken rice
CASE OF TRAJCE STOJANOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 5 June 2014. Kone AG and Others v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG.
CASE OF SOUSA MARINHO AND MARINHO MEIRELES PINTO v. PORTUGAL

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2015. Jean-Claude Van Hove v CNP Assurances SA.

C-96/14 • 62014CJ0096 • ECLI:EU:C:2015:262

Inbound citations: 41
•
Cited paragraphs: 15
•
Outbound citations: 44

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

3x unique documents citing • y5 citations total to oF paragraphs

Outbound citations

20 unique documents cited • 4T citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846