Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SHLEPKIN v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1314/2013 of 16 December 2013 on the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2014-2018) complementing the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
CASE OF HADŽIMEJLIĆ AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 March 2010. European Commission v Italian Republic.
CASE OF BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KELLER, SPANO AND KJØLBRO
Regulation (EEC) No 54/75 of the Commission of 9 January 1975 amending the amounts applicable as compensatory amounts for cereals and rice
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 840/90 of 2 April 1990 on the supply of refined rape seed oil as food aid
CASE OF WEMHOFF v. GERMANYINDIVIDUAL OPINION OF JUDGE A. FAVRE
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89 of 29 May 1989 laying down general rules on the definition, description and presentation of spirit drinks
CASE OF STONE COURT SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A. AND 7 OTHER CASES AGAINST SPAIN

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 May 1993. Johannes Peter v Hauptzollamt Regensburg.

C-290/91 • 61991CJ0290 • ECLI:EU:C:1993:220

Inbound citations: 9
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 20

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

D unique documents citing • r citations total to I paragraphs

Outbound citations

v unique documents cited • FL citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846