Browsing history:

↳
CASES OF I. AND CHRISTINE GOODWIN AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 900/84 of 31 March 1984 fixing the monetary compensatory amounts and certain coefficients and rates required for their application
CASE OF SCHMAUTZER v. AUSTRIASEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2022. Criminal proceedings against HV.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 1996. Argos Distributors Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2791/86 of 22 July 1986 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 679/85 as regards the specimen single document form
CASE OF ESTEMIROVA v. RUSSIAJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES DEDOV AND ZÃœND
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 March 2023. R.J.R. v Registrų centras.
CASE OF KHAN v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
CASE OF ASSOCIATION LES TÉMOINS DE JÉHOVAH v. FRANCE

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 23 January 2014. DMC Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Mitte.

C-164/12 • 62012CJ0164 • ECLI:EU:C:2014:20

Inbound citations: 51
•
Cited paragraphs: 20
•
Outbound citations: 34

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

22 unique documents citing • sh citations total to AH paragraphs

Outbound citations

3K unique documents cited • rA citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846