Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KASPAROV v. RUSSIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KELLER
CASE OF NAUMOSKI AGAINST "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Judgment of the Court of 9 August 1994. Meyhui NV v Schott Zwiesel Glaswerke AG.
CASE OF M.M.B. v. SLOVAKIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
CASE OF DİLİPAK AND KARAKAYA v. TURKEY [Extracts]CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SPANO
CASE OF LIND v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 384/2011 of 18 April 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF SÉRVULO & ASSOCIADOS - SOCIEDADE DE ADVOGADOS, RL AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 11 December 2014. Khaled Boudjlida v Préfet des Pyrénées-Atlantiques.
CASE OF NALBANDYAN v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MOTOC

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 1997. Bic Benelux SA v Belgian State.

C-13/96 • 61996CJ0013 • ECLI:EU:C:1997:173

Inbound citations: 16
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 11

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Ko unique documents citing • aV citations total to V paragraphs

Outbound citations

R unique documents cited • mW citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846