Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LTD AND J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LAND LTD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ODIEVRE v. FRANCEJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES WILDHABER, Sir Nicolas BRATZA, BONELLO, LOUCAIDES, CABRAL BARRETO, TULKENS AND PELLONPÄÄ
Judgment of the Court of 9 February 1994. Salomone Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein.
HOPPE v. GERMANYDISSENTING OPINION OF MR G. RESS
SHCHICHKA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LTD AND J.A. PYE (OXFORD) LAND LTD v. THE UNITED KINGDOMJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES MARUSTE, GARLICKI AND BORREGO BORREGO

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 9 February 1994. Salomone Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung Nordrhein.

C-319/92 • 61992CJ0319 • ECLI:EU:C:1994:47

Inbound citations: 12
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 29

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

8T unique documents citing • Gl citations total to q paragraphs

Outbound citations

K unique documents cited • IJ citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846