Browsing history:

↳
Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 3 juillet 2025. Communauté d’Agglomération du Boulonnais contre Commission européenne.
CASE OF MILISAVLJEVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF NAVALNYY AND OFITSEROV AGAINST RUSSIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF GUROV v. MOLDOVACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE GARLICKI JOINED BY JUDGE PELLONPÄÄ
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 May 2001. Freemans plc v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.
Commission Directive 2006/133/EC of 11 December 2006 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include flusilazole as active substance (Text with EEA relevance)
Règlement (CEE) n 28/72 de la Commission, du 5 janvier 1972, fixant le montant de l'aide dans le secteur des graines oléagineuses
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)JOINT SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES HOLMBÄCK, ROSS AND WOLD
CASE OF JOSAN v. MOLDOVAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PAVLOVSCHI
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2010. Christos Gogos v European Commission.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 April 2013. Steinel Vertrieb GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld.

C-595/11 • 62011CJ0595 • ECLI:EU:C:2013:251

Inbound citations: 12
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 49

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

W unique documents citing • nJ citations total to q paragraphs

Outbound citations

DP unique documents cited • Ww citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846