Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF NERVA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOUCAIDES
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGALDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BOÅ NJAK
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1322/79 of 29 June 1979 fixing the amount of the subsidy on oil seeds
CASE OF ČOLIĆ AGAINST CROATIA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 21/85 of 3 January 1985 fixing the export refunds on malt
CASE OF TALPIS v. ITALYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SPANO
CASE OF PERKS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOMJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TULKENS AND GREVE
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2001. Emesa Sugar (Free Zone) NV v Council of the European Union.
CASE OF ISGRÒ v. ITALY
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 49/96 of 12 January 1996 suspending the preferential customs duties and re-establishing the Common Customs Tariff duty on imports of large-flowered roses originating in Morocco

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 28 October 1999.

European Fertilizer Manufacturers' Association (EFMA) v Council of the European Union.

T-210/95 • 61995TJ0210 • ECLI:EU:T:1999:273

Inbound citations: 33
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 27

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

3J unique documents citing • c4 citations total to c paragraphs

Outbound citations

UI unique documents cited • 5j citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707