Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF V v. THE CZECH REPUBLICPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELÃ“SEGUI
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 682/2014 of 20 June 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, as regards the substance ‘closantel’ Text with EEA relevance
CASE OF MANGÎR AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 317/96 of 21 February 1996 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF G.B. AND R.B. AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND 1 OTHER CASE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1989/91 of 5 July 1991 on imports of preserved cultivated mushrooms from third countries
CASE OF RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KELLER
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MOSLER
Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 September 2018. EOS KSI Slovensko s.r.o. v Ján Danko and Margita Danková.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1010/98 of 14 May 1998 allowing Germany an exemption from the quality standards for apricots

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2017.

European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.

C-591/14 • 62014CJ0591 • ECLI:EU:C:2017:670

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 24

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Q unique documents citing • n citations total to i paragraphs

Outbound citations

5H unique documents cited • bO citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846