Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021. VK v An Bord Pleanála.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1009/78 of 18 May 1978 introducing a countervailing charge on tomatoes originating in Bulgaria and Romania
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 October 2011. European Commission v Portuguese Republic.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 September 2021 (Extracts). Nichicon Corporation v European Commission.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 210/85 of 25 January 1985 classifying goods in subheading 21.07 G I d) 1 of the Common Customs Tariff
CASE OF VERMEIRE v. BELGIUMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
CASE OF SAVERIADES v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KARAKA Åž
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1890/90 of 4 July 1990 fixing the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in its unaltered state
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1422/76 of 21 June 1976 laying down rules for determining rice marketing centres other than Arles and Vercelli
CASE OF WIZERKANIUK v. POLANDJOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES GARLICKI AND VUČINIĆ

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 september 2013.

European Commission v French Republic.

C-296/11 • 62011CJ0296 • ECLI:EU:C:2013:612

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 10

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

R unique documents citing • 7 citations total to p paragraphs

Outbound citations

d unique documents cited • 5I citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846