Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF G.I.E.M. S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SABATO
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 7 September 2022. Set SpA v European Commission.
CASE OF DÜRRÜ MAZHAR ÇEVİK AND MÜNİRE ASUMAN ÇEVİK DAĞDELEN AGAINST TURKEY
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 429/2011 of 2 May 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EC) No 965/94 of 28 April 1994 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2381/89 of 2 August 1989 laying down detailed rules for granting compensation for tuna for the canning industry
CASE OF DONOHOE v. IRELANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
Judgment of the Court of 26 May 1993. Dimitrios Tsiotras v Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart.
Regulation (EEC) No 12/73 of the Commission of 3 January 1973 fixing the import levy on molasses
CASE OF ROMIĆ AND OTHERS v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE TURKOVIĆ

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 May 2015. Finanzamt Ulm v Ingeborg Wagner-Raith.

C-560/13 • 62013CJ0560 • ECLI:EU:C:2015:347

Inbound citations: 39
•
Cited paragraphs: 14
•
Outbound citations: 34

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

lQ unique documents citing • os citations total to T8 paragraphs

Outbound citations

c5 unique documents cited • yh citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846