Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TOŢCHI AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE
CASE OF RUOKANEN AND OTHERS v. FINLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CHANTURIA
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 November 1990. Carmina di Leo v Land Berlin.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 10 October 2013. Swm Costruzioni 2 SpA and Mannocchi Luigino DI v Provincia di Fermo.
CASE OF OSYPENKO v. UKRAINEPARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KALAYDJIEVA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 589/2008 of 23 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards for eggs
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 309/89 of 7 February 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 264/89 introducing a countervailing charge on fresh clementines originating in Marocco
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2009. Apis-Hristovich EOOD v Lakorda AD.
CASE OF VALDÍS FJÖLNISDÓTTIR AND OTHERS v. ICELANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 15 november 2012.

Council of the European Union v Nadiany Bamba.

C-417/11 P • 62011CJ0417 • ECLI:EU:C:2012:718

Inbound citations: 175
•
Cited paragraphs: 19
•
Outbound citations: 84

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

CPU unique documents citing • RZw citations total to AB paragraphs

Outbound citations

i4 unique documents cited • Cw citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846