Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF TENCE v. SLOVENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/221 of 10 February 2015 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
CASE OF B. v. FRANCEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
AKÇEŞME v. TURKEY - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice
CASE OF ALENTSEVA v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
CASE OF JASAR AGAINST "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" AND 3 OTHER CASES
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 12 July 2012. Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich.
CASE OF VESELINSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
CASE OF PRAMSTALLER v. AUSTRIASEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MARTENS
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2000. Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Midland Bank plc.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 March 2018. Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV.

C-284/16 • 62016CJ0284 • ECLI:EU:C:2018:158

Inbound citations: 174
•
Cited paragraphs: 29
•
Outbound citations: 38

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

wG unique documents citing • ylK citations total to z8 paragraphs

Outbound citations

Hm unique documents cited • Kj citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846