Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF AINIS AND OTHERS v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BOÅ NJAK
CASE OF SAVRAN v. DENMARKJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KJØLBRO, MOTOC AND MOUROU-VIKSTRÖM
Council Directive 2000/47/EC of 20 July 2000 amending Directives 69/169/EEC and 92/12/EEC as regards temporary quantitative restrictions on beer imports into Finland
Council Regulation (EC) No 2063/94 of 27 July 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90 establishing a European Training Foundation
CASE OF ANONYMOS TOURISTIKI ETAIRIA XENODOCHEIA KRITIS v. GREECE
PANEVA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA" and 2 other applications
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 97/82 of 18 January 1982 fixing the sluice-gate prices and levies for pigmeat
CASE OF DUDCHENKO v. RUSSIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
96/32/EC: Commission Decision of 19 December 1995 amending Decision 93/13/EEC laying down the procedures for veterinary checks at Community border inspection posts on products from third countries
CASE OF BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDSDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THÓR VILHJÁLMSSON

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021. Peek & Cloppenburg KG, v Peek & Cloppenburg KG.

C-371/20 • 62020CJ0371 • ECLI:EU:C:2021:674

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 22

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

R unique documents citing • h citations total to 4 paragraphs

Outbound citations

RK unique documents cited • kG citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846