Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2021. John Dalli v European Commission.
CASE OF JUCYS v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE CABRAL BARRETO
CASE OF P., C. AND S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BAKA
CASE OF HENNIG v. AUSTRIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE VAJIĆ
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 149/85 of 18 January 1985 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
Commission Directive 75/681/EEC of 23 September 1975 amending Commission Directive 73/95/EEC in so far as it concerns the methods of application of inward processing
CASE OF VICENT DEL CAMPO v. SPAINJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KELLER AND Serghides
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2295/2003 of 23 December 2003 introducing detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 on certain marketing standards for eggs
Commission Regulation (EC) No 147/1999 of 21 January 1999 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3858/87 of 22 December 1987 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1351/72 on the recognition of producer groups for hops

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021. Peek & Cloppenburg KG, v Peek & Cloppenburg KG.

C-371/20 • 62020CJ0371 • ECLI:EU:C:2021:674

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 22

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

g unique documents citing • 4 citations total to I paragraphs

Outbound citations

j4 unique documents cited • vF citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846