Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2000. Cidrerie Ruwet SA v Cidre Stassen SA and HP Bulmer Ltd.
CASE OF CROCHARD AND SIX OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES SAJÓ, L ó PEZ GUERRA AND WOJTYCZEK
CASE OF TÜZEL v. TURKEY (No. 2)
CASE OF R.S. v. POLANDJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES NICOLAOU, WOJTYCZEK AND VEHABOVIĆ
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4128/87 of 9 December 1987 laying down conditions for the entry of flue-cured Virginia type, light air-cured Burley type (including Burley hybrids), light air-cured Maryland type and fire-cured tobacco, falling within subheadings 2401 10 10 to 2401 10 49 and 2401 20 10 to 2401 20 49 of the combined nomenclature
Yankov v. Bulgaria
CASE OF CEVIZOVIC AGAINST GERMANY
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 1992. Claus Ramrath v Ministre de la Justice, and l'Institut des réviseurs d'entreprises.
CASE OF MARTINS SERRA AND ANDRADE CANCIO v. PORTUGAL

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 6 November 1990.

Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities.

C-86/89 • 61989CJ0086 • ECLI:EU:C:1990:373

Inbound citations: 41
•
Cited paragraphs: 5
•
Outbound citations: 10

Keywords

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

bV unique documents citing • aV citations total to Q paragraphs

Outbound citations

m unique documents cited • xQ citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846