Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MKHITARYAN v. ARMENIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE FURA-SANDSTRÖM
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 189/87 of 22 January 1987 introducing a countervailing charge on apples originating in Poland
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2013. European Commission v Czech Republic.
AFFAIRE GARRIDO HERRERO c. ESPAGNEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RAVARANI
CASE OF Y.Y. v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS, JOINED BY JUDGE KŪRIS
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1583/86 of 23 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3103/76 on aid for durum wheat
CASE OF AUGUSTO v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SPIELMANN
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 March 2021. VK v An Bord Pleanála.
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KŪRIS
CASE OF N. v. ROMANIA (No. 2)PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOTOC

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 April 1995. BLP Group plc v Commissioners of Customs & Excise.

C-4/94 • 61994CJ0004 • ECLI:EU:C:1995:107

Inbound citations: 60
•
Cited paragraphs: 11
•
Outbound citations: 9

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

4f unique documents citing • Y4 citations total to Qk paragraphs

Outbound citations

j unique documents cited • D citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846