Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 18 October 2012. Mednis SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.
CASES OF BERGMANN AND PRODĚLALOVÁ AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1636/97 of 14 August 1997 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on malt
CASE OF S.J. v. BELGIUMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE POWER-FORDE
CASE OF SÖDERMAN v. SWEDENDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KALAYDJIEVA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 291/92 of 6 February 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1730/87 laying down quality standards for table grapes
CASE OF KARASTELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 15 November 2012. Bericap Záródástechnikai Bt. v Plastinnova 2000 Kft.
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 97/82 of 18 January 1982 fixing the sluice-gate prices and levies for pigmeat
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 September 2022. WT v European Commission.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 1998. Lease Plan Luxembourg SA v Belgian State.

C-390/96 • 61996CJ0390 • ECLI:EU:C:1998:206

Inbound citations: 19
•
Cited paragraphs: 11
•
Outbound citations: 10

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

2z unique documents citing • vH citations total to H6 paragraphs

Outbound citations

9 unique documents cited • tF citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846