Browsing history:

↳
SUREK and OZDEMIR v. TURKEYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MM S. TRECHSEL, E. BUSUTTIL,
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 31/82 of 7 January 1982 fixing the export refunds on malt
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJANCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE H Ü SEYNOV
TIMES NEWSPAPER LTD., GILES, KNIGHTLEY and POTTER v. the UNITED KINGDOM
CASES OF EGMEZ AGAINST CYPRUS AND DENIZCI AND OTHERS AGAINST CYPRUS
CASE OF YURIY NIKOLAYEVICH IVANOV AGAINST UKRAINE AND 2 OTHER CASES
C.E.M. FIREARMS LIMITED AND BRADFORD SHOOTING CENTRE AND 11 OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Regulation No 10/65/EEC of the Council laying down common quality standards for garlic
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 19 April 2012. Artegodan GmbH v European Commission.
Judgment of the Court of 20 September 1990. S. Z. Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie.

Document text Analytics

Judgment of the Court of 14 December 2000. Masterfoods Ltd v HB Ice Cream Ltd.

C-344/98 • 61998CJ0344 • ECLI:EU:C:2000:689

Inbound citations: 57
•
Cited paragraphs: 14
•
Outbound citations: 13

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

G2 unique documents citing • gc citations total to lf paragraphs

Outbound citations

NV unique documents cited • S8 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707