Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SHELKOVENKOV AND TRUBITSYN v. RUSSIA and 21 other applications

Doc ref: 4041/16, 13061/18, 59645/18, 4737/19, 7131/19, 7588/19, 7931/19, 8487/19, 11466/19, 24946/19, 25368/... • ECHR ID: 001-229257

Document date: November 2, 2023

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

SHELKOVENKOV AND TRUBITSYN v. RUSSIA and 21 other applications

Doc ref: 4041/16, 13061/18, 59645/18, 4737/19, 7131/19, 7588/19, 7931/19, 8487/19, 11466/19, 24946/19, 25368/... • ECHR ID: 001-229257

Document date: November 2, 2023

Cited paragraphs only

Published on 27 November 2023

FOURTH SECTION

Application no. 4041/16 Aleksandr Anatolyevich SHELKOVENKOV and

Nikita Olegovich TRUBITSYN against Russia and 21 other applications

(see list appended)

PROCEDURAL INFORMATION

Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 November 2023, the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, that notice of the applications should be given to the Government of Russia.

In the applications marked by an asterisk, other complaints were raised. This part of the applications has been struck out of the Court’s list of cases or declared inadmissible by the Court, sitting in a single-judge formation, assisted by a rapporteur as provided for in Article 24 § 2 of the Convention.

In the enclosed list of applications, whenever an applicant is referred to using initials, this indicates that the Court has authorised anonymity for that person, whose identity will not be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4).

For further information on the procedure following communication of an application brought against Russia, subject of well-established case law of the Court, please refer to the Court’s website .

SUBJECT MATTER

The applications concern complaints raised under Article 11 of the Convention relating to disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).

APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention (disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal offence

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

4041/16*

25/12/2015

Aleksandr Anatolyevich SHELKOVENKOV

1995Nikita Olegovich TRUBITSYN

1988Nikolay Sergeyevich Zboroshenko

Mytishchi

Rally to support I. Dadin

Moscow,

17/11/2015

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

5 days of detention

(Shelkovenkov)

3 days of detention

(Trubitsyn)

Moscow City Court

20/11/2015

Moscow City Court

20/11/2015

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings against each applicant,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting each applicant.

13061/18*

14/03/2018

Andrey Sergeyevich PIVOVAROV

1981Sergey Aleksandrovich Golubok

Vilnius

Opposition rally

St Petersburg, 28/01/2018

Protest rally

Moscow,

01/07/2020

Rally against the constitutional amendments

Moscow,

15/07/2020

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

article 20.2 § 3 of CAO

25 days of detention

10 days of detention

14 days of detention

St Petersburg City Court

05/03/2018

Moscow City Court

21/09/2020

Moscow City Court

08/09/2020

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in three sets of administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in the 2018 case.

59645/18*

06/12/2018

Yuliya Viktorovna SHEVCHENKO

1999Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov

Novocheboksarsk

Opposition rally

Cheboksary,

05/05/2018

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Cheboksary,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

20 hours of community work

20 hours of community work

fine of

RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic

08/06/2018

Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic

08/06/2018

Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic

16/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in three sets of administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in the 2021 case,

Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - Final decisions in both set of proceedings - 08/06/2018, Supreme Court of Chuvashia Republic, Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO and Art. 20.2 § 5 CAO; overlap of the facts constituting the basis for the applicant’s prosecution and punishment in the second set of proceedings with substantially the same facts underlying his conviction in the first set of proceedings concerning the same "hybrid" rally on 05/05/2018.

4737/19*

05/12/2018

Tatyana Alekseyevna PAMFILOVA

1999Kseniya Mikhaylovna Korchilova

St Petersburg

Opposition rally

St Petersburg,

05/05/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

fine of

RUB 700

St Petersburg City Court

05/06/2018

St Petersburg City Court

05/06/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 05/05/2018 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Prot. 7 Art. 4 - right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings - following the appeal decision in the case under Art. 20.2 § 5 of CAO the applicant was also finally convicted, for substantially the same facts, in the case under Art. 19.3 § 1 of CAO.

7131/19*

21/01/2019

Vladimir Mikhaylovich SINYAKOV

1948Ivan Yuryevich Zhdanov

Vilnius

Opposition rally

Kaliningrad,

05/05/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Kaliningrad Regional Court

09/08/2018

7588/19*

16/01/2019

Timur Gabdelbaryyevich GATAULLIN

1986Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov

Kazan

Rally against the pension reform

Kazan,

09/09/2018

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Kazan,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of

RUB 20,000

fine of

RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

19/12/2018

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

05/05/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 09-10/09/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings in 2018.

7931/19*

16/01/2019

Vadim Olegovich STEPANOV

1995Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov

Kazan

Rally against the pension reform

Kazan,

09/09/2018

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

4 days of detention

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

18/09/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 09-10/09/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - Right of appeal against criminal conviction/sentence - immediate execution of the sentence of administrative detention; an appeal against it had no suspensive effect.

8487/19*

04/02/2019

Mikhail Yuryevich POSTNIKOV

1991Igor Nikolayevich Sholokhov

Kazan

Rally against the pension reform

Kazan,

09/09/2018

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

10 days of detention

Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic

29/12/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 27-28/12/2018 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report in relation to the rally on 09/09/2018,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - Right of appeal against criminal conviction/sentence - immediate execution of the sentence of administrative detention; an appeal against it had no suspensive effect.

11466/19*

02/02/2019

Danila Andreyevich SARTAKOV

1996Olga Sergeyevna Bederson

Perm

Opposition rally

Perm,

05/05/2018

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

30 hours of community work

Perm Regional Court

02/08/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

24946/19*

09/04/2019

Bogdan Vladimirovich LEVIN

1998Maksim Vladimirovich Olenichev

St Petersburg

Rally against the pension reform

St Petersburg,

09/09/2018

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

09/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - 09-10/09/2018 detention in a police station after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.

25368/19*

30/04/2019

Leonid Gennadyevich MURZAYEV

1970Ernest Aleksandrovich Mezak

Saint-Barthélemy-d’Anjou

Rally against the pension reform

Perm,

09/09/2018

article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

180 hours of community work

Perm Regional Court

31/10/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.

7962/21*

26/12/2020

Sergey Vladimirovich FOMIN

1983Svetlana Nikolayevna Bayturina

Moscow

Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow,

27/07/2019

article 20.2 § 3 of CAO

fine of

RUB 30,000

Moscow City Court

26/06/2020

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 24/12/2019 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.

28057/21*

17/05/2021

Danil Sergeyevich MESHCHERYAKOV

1991Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

16/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

28058/21*

17/05/2021

Dmitriy Vladimirovich BUDKOV

1990Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

25/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.

28112/21*

17/05/2021

Aleksey Aleksandrovich YELYSHEV

1998Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

16/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

28117/21*

17/05/2021

Sofya Andreyevna BELOUSOVA

1997Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

17/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 23-24/01/2021 detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

28154/21*

17/05/2021

Vladislav Sergeyevich GERASIMOV

2000Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

10/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

30208/21*

12/05/2021

Danil Yuryevich SHTIL

1997Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

17/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

30462/21

11/05/2021

Dmitriy Vladimirovich MELNIKOV

1967Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

23/03/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 01/02/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

36789/21

05/07/2021

Yelena Vladimirovna MIKHAYLOVA

1992Dmitriy Georgiyevich Gerasimov

St Petersburg

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

St Petersburg,

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

10 days of detention

St Petersburg City Court

09/02/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 31/01/2021 escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant,

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of detention; an appeal against it had no suspensive effect.

40294/21*

27/07/2021

Andrey Vitalyevich KATAMANOV

1996Anna Yevgenyevna Bochilo

Barnaul

Rally to support

A. Navalnyy

Barnaul,

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of

RUB 10,000

Altay Regional Court

03/03/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

51059/21

05/10/2021

Bogdan Gennadyevich LITVIN

1994Sergey Aleksandrovich Loktev

St Petersburg

Rally (performance) to support Twitter

St Petersburg,

30/03/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

7 days of detention

St Petersburg City Court

06/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - on 30/03/2021 and 01/04/2021 escorting to and detention in a police station for and after compiling an offence report,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846