Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF KLUSKA v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: October 2, 2012

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF KLUSKA v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: October 2, 2012

Cited paragraphs only

JOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF

JUDGE S HIRVELÄ AND BIANKU

The instant case raises issues similar to those dealt with by the Court in Moskal v. Poland (no. 10373/05) and Lewandowski v. Poland (38459/03) . The majority in those cases found that there had been a breach of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. We dissented. We dissent in this case also, for the reasons we gave in our Joint Partly Dissenting Opinion in the Moskal case and in the Lewandowski case.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707