CASE OF RADU v. GERMANYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES VILLIGER AND POWER-FORDE

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: May 16, 2013

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

CASE OF RADU v. GERMANYJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES VILLIGER AND POWER-FORDE

Doc ref: • ECHR ID:

Document date: May 16, 2013

Cited paragraphs only

JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES VILLIGER AND POWER-FORDE

Article 5 § 1 (a)

Article 5 § 1 (e)

(i) A true mental disorder?

(ii) Warranting compulsory confinement?

(iii) Persistence of a true mental disorder?

[1] Article 63 of the Criminal Code

[2] Article 67d § 6 of the Criminal Code

[3] For the necessity to establish that condition, see, inter alia , Kallweit v. Gemany , no. 17792/07, §§ 55-56, 13 January 2011; and S. v. Germany , no. 3300/10, § 94, 28 June 2012)

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant