JOINT CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGES RAIMONDI, SPANO AND KJØLBRO

For the reasons expressed in our joint concurring opinion in Karácsony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461/13, 16 September 2014), we agree that there has been a violation of Article 10 and Article 13 of the Convention in the present case.

PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE K Ū RIS

I voted against point 5 of the operative part of the judgment. The reasons for this dissent are in essence identical to those explained in my partly dissenting opinion in Kar á csony and Others v. Hungary (no. 42461/13, 16 September 2014).

[1] On 13 February 2014 Parliament adopted an amendment to this procedure, introducing the possibility for a fined MP to seek remedy before a committee (Act no. XIV of 2014, enacting a new section 51/A into Act no. XXXVI of 2012 ).

[2] The President of the European Council, Mr Van Rompuy, addressed the Parliament during the plenary sitting of 24 February 2010. Following that speech, a number of Members spoke, including the applicant, Mr Farage. By letter , the President of the Parliament, Mr Buzek, imposed a penalty on the applicant consisting in the forfeiture of entitlement to the daily subsistence allowance for a period of ten days .