JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES GÖLCÜKLÜ, PETTITI, PALM AND JUNGWIERT

As the judgment of the Court points out, revision is an exceptional procedure and the admissibility of any request for revision of a judgment of the Court under this procedure must be subject to strict scrutiny.

Against this background we do not think that in the circumstances of the case the request for revision can be considered admissible.

[*]  The case is numbered 25/1992/370/444.  The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).  The last two numbers indicate the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court since its creation and on the list of the corresponding originating applications to the Commission.

[*]   Rules A apply to all cases referred to the Court before the entry into force of Protocol No. 9 (P9) ( 1 October 1994 ) and thereafter only to cases concerning States not bound by that Protocol (P9).  They correspond to the Rules that came into force on 1 January 1983 , as amended several times subsequently.