DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ IN RESPECT OF THE COMPLAINT UNDER ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION

There can be no doubt that the Court ' s finding regarding the violation of Article 5 § 1 is correct. The reason I did not vote with the majority was to underline how abusive many of the applicant ' s claims are, bordering in some respects on the situation contemplated in Article 17 of the Convention. In that regard see also my dissent concerning the applicant ' s Article 3 claims.

[1] See also ICJ, Pulp Mills on the R iver Uruguay (Argentine v. Uruguay ) , Order of 13 July 2006, §§ 62 and 73.