Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

HORSHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. L. LOUCAIDES

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: January 21, 1997

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

HORSHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. L. LOUCAIDES

Doc ref:ECHR ID:

Document date: January 21, 1997

Cited paragraphs only

           PARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. L. LOUCAIDES

      While on the facts of this case it may not be necessary to

consider the substance of the applicant's complaints under Article 12

(see the partially dissenting opinion of my colleagues Mrs. G.H. THUNE,

MM. J. MUCHA, P. LORENZEN and K. HERNDL).  I would refer to my

dissenting opinion in the case of Sheffield v. the United Kingdom

(No. 22985/93, Comm. Rep. 21.1.97) and find no violation for the

reasons given therein.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846